This is a review *template*. Besides handling the [ ]-marked tests you are also supposed to fix the template before pasting into bugzilla: - Add issues you find to the list of issues on top. If there isn't such a list, create one. - Add your own remarks to the template checks. - Add new lines marked [!] or [?] when you discover new things not listed by fedora-review. - Change or remove any text in the template which is plain wrong. In this case you could also file a bug against fedora-review - Remove the "[ ] Manual check required", you will not have any such lines in what you paste. - Remove attachments which you deem not really useful (the rpmlint ones are mandatory, though) - Remove this text Package Review ============== Legend: [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated [ ] = Manual review needed Issues: ======= - Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT Note: Using both %{buildroot} and $RPM_BUILD_ROOT See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_macros - The License field must be a valid SPDX expression. Note: Not a valid SPDX expression 'AGPLv3'. It seems that you are using the old Fedora license abbreviations. Try `license-fedora2spdx' for converting it to SPDX. See: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SPDX_Licenses_Phase_1 ===== MUST items ===== C/C++: [ ]: Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. [x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: Package contains no static executables. [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. Generic: [ ]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. Note: Using prebuilt packages [ ]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [ ]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %license. [ ]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Affero General Public License v3.0", "Apache License 2.0", "*No copyright* GNU Affero General Public License v3.0", "MIT License", "libpng License", "zlib License", "*No copyright* Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0". 2758 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/augustus/licensecheck.txt [ ]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [ ]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. [ ]: Changelog in prescribed format. [ ]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. [ ]: Development files must be in a -devel package [ ]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [ ]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [ ]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [ ]: Package does not generate any conflict. [ ]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [ ]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and Provides are present. [ ]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. [ ]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. [ ]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. [ ]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [ ]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. [ ]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines [x]: Package installs properly. [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. [x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop-file-validate if there is such a file. [x]: Dist tag is present. [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't work. [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. [x]: Package is not relocatable. [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. [x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size (~1MB) or number of files. Note: Documentation size is 0 bytes in 0 files. [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local ===== SHOULD items ===== Generic: [!]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [ ]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [ ]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). [ ]: Package functions as described. [ ]: Latest version is packaged. [ ]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [ ]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream publishes signatures. Note: gpgverify is not used. [ ]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [ ]: %check is present and all tests pass. [ ]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [ ]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. Note: %define requiring justification: %define packagePatch 1 [x]: Buildroot is not present [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag [x]: SourceX is a working URL. ===== EXTRA items ===== Generic: [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. Note: No rpmlint messages. [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package is arched. Rpmlint ------- Checking: augustus-4.0.0-1.fc43.aarch64.rpm augustus-4.0.0-1.fc43.src.rpm ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.13/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmphqspeorp')] checks: 32, packages: 2 augustus.aarch64: W: unstripped-binary-or-object /usr/bin/augustus augustus.aarch64: E: summary-too-long Augustus is a fork of the Julius project that intends to incorporate gameplay changes. augustus.src: E: summary-too-long Augustus is a fork of the Julius project that intends to incorporate gameplay changes. augustus.aarch64: W: summary-ended-with-dot Augustus is a fork of the Julius project that intends to incorporate gameplay changes. augustus.src: W: summary-ended-with-dot Augustus is a fork of the Julius project that intends to incorporate gameplay changes. augustus.src: W: strange-permission augustus.spec 666 augustus.src: W: strange-permission v4.0.0-1.tar.gz 666 augustus.src: W: strange-permission v4.0.0.tar.gz 666 augustus.aarch64: E: spelling-error ('gameplay', 'Summary(en_US) gameplay -> game play, game-play, nameplate') augustus.aarch64: E: spelling-error ('gameplay', '%description -l en_US gameplay -> game play, game-play, nameplate') augustus.aarch64: E: spelling-error ('Gameplay', '%description -l en_US Gameplay -> Game play, Game-play, Nameplate') augustus.aarch64: E: spelling-error ('labour', '%description -l en_US labour -> labor, lab our, lab-our') augustus.src: E: spelling-error ('gameplay', 'Summary(en_US) gameplay -> game play, game-play, nameplate') augustus.src: E: spelling-error ('gameplay', '%description -l en_US gameplay -> game play, game-play, nameplate') augustus.src: E: spelling-error ('Gameplay', '%description -l en_US Gameplay -> Game play, Game-play, Nameplate') augustus.src: E: spelling-error ('labour', '%description -l en_US labour -> labor, lab our, lab-our') augustus.spec:42: W: setup-not-quiet augustus.spec:43: W: setup-not-quiet augustus.aarch64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary augustus augustus.aarch64: W: no-documentation augustus.spec: W: no-%check-section augustus.aarch64: W: name-repeated-in-summary Augustus augustus.src: W: name-repeated-in-summary Augustus augustus.aarch64: W: invalid-license AGPLv3 augustus.src: W: invalid-license AGPLv3 augustus.aarch64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.8.0-1 ['4.0.0-1.fc43', '4.0.0-1'] augustus.aarch64: E: explicit-lib-dependency libpng augustus.aarch64: E: description-line-too-long The aim of this project is to provide enhanced, customizable gameplay to Caesar 3 using project Julius UI enhancements. augustus.aarch64: E: description-line-too-long Augustus is able to load Caesar 3 and Julius saves, however saves made with Augustus will not work outside Augustus. augustus.src: E: description-line-too-long The aim of this project is to provide enhanced, customizable gameplay to Caesar 3 using project Julius UI enhancements. augustus.src: E: description-line-too-long Augustus is able to load Caesar 3 and Julius saves, however saves made with Augustus will not work outside Augustus. 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 15 errors, 16 warnings, 7 filtered, 15 badness; has taken 2.8 s Rpmlint (installed packages) ---------------------------- (none): E: there is no installed rpm "augustus". There are no files to process nor additional arguments. Nothing to do, aborting. ============================ rpmlint session starts ============================ rpmlint: 2.7.0 configuration: /usr/lib/python3.14/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml /etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml checks: 32, packages: 1 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 0 filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.0 s Source checksums ---------------- https://github.com/dudekaa/augustus-spec/archive/refs/tags/v4.0.0-1.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : 3795a2bd09e989afb3dec8a1eaee248c7f47820221ee489ee63347903128b6ce CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : 3795a2bd09e989afb3dec8a1eaee248c7f47820221ee489ee63347903128b6ce https://github.com/Keriew/augustus/archive/refs/tags/v4.0.0.tar.gz : CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : d95957ccf7b66cec80d787692ff857a7a1558eccfa1927e22f717891b2dfb4a2 CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : d95957ccf7b66cec80d787692ff857a7a1558eccfa1927e22f717891b2dfb4a2 Requires -------- augustus (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): SDL2 SDL2_mixer ld-linux-aarch64.so.1()(64bit) libSDL2-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libSDL2_mixer-2.0.so.0()(64bit) libc.so.6()(64bit) libm.so.6()(64bit) libpng libpng16.so.16()(64bit) libpng16.so.16(PNG16_0)(64bit) libz.so.1()(64bit) rtld(GNU_HASH) Provides -------- augustus: application() application(augustus.desktop) augustus augustus(aarch-64) Generated by fedora-review 0.10.0 (e79b66b) last change: 2023-07-24 Command line :/bin/fedora-review --no-colors --prebuilt --rpm-spec --name augustus --mock-config /var/lib/copr-rpmbuild/results/configs/child.cfg Buildroot used: fedora-43-aarch64 Active plugins: C/C++, Generic, Shell-api Disabled plugins: PHP, Java, Python, Perl, SugarActivity, Haskell, R, fonts, Ocaml Disabled flags: EXARCH, EPEL6, EPEL7, DISTTAG, BATCH